Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Lumley Castle Hotel
Sponsored by
Chester-le-Street, www.lumleycastle.com
 
 
Monday, 8th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Experiment failed



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

HAVING just had his major new parking scheme rejected, in last week's letters page, Ken Wilson, head of planning at North Tyneside Council, wrote that his parking scheme was intended to provide "a ready supply of short term parking close to shops, helping to boost Whitley Bay's economy" and that the system "already works effectively elsewhere in the borough".
Apparently the claim is that, by making cars stay for less time, it would make room for more cars to visit the town centre.

In fact, one of the scheme's original main objectives was "to discourage car-use in town centres". Is it possible to reconc
ile that with a claim to "boost Whitley Bay's economy"?

Fortunately, we don't have to speculate about what would really happen -we have figures. In North Shields, parking charges brought a decline in town centre retail trade, with a 20 per cent drop in foot-fall. Is this a system that "already works effectively elsewhere in the borough"?

The council claimed this scheme was "experimental" - well, the results show it failed.

North Tyneside Council has promoted out-of-town shopping, in competition to town centres, at the same time as policies hostile to town centre businesses, such as parking controls. It has claimed these two aspects of policy are not related.

North Tyneside Council has backed a planning strategy based on large, new out-of-town developments on formerly green-belt land, which require building large amounts of new roads. North Tyneside has based its economic strategy on the assumption that economic growth depends upon increased car-mobility.

North Tyneside has decisively rejected options such as Transport Development Areas that would have put public transport at the forefront of new development. All this despite and contrary to national government policy to minimise green-belt development and implement road
traffic reduction.

However, the public has voted for a new direction. Traffic and planning
policies were a key issue in the election and the results showed a decisive rejection of current policies. It is clear the voters want to keep and regenerate their town centres and high streets.

Now of course, it may be unfair to blame all of this on Mr Wilson, but it is unfortunate that he still seeks to promote policies which have been rejected so clearly by voters.

Today, we have to ask how the council will deliver a paradigm shift - a 180 degree turn - from a strategy based upon out-of-town development, to one of regeneration of town centres and their small, high-street businesses. Does the council show signs that it understand what is required of it? Or will they try to fight change and carry on in the same old direction? Do we have the right people to understand the problems of high-street businesses and their regeneration?

NATHAN ALLONBY
Cullercoats.




The full article contains 473 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 May 2008 1:24 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Whitley Bay
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.